UK Museums and the Web
Evaluation form

Please help us evaluate the day and suggest improvements for next year.

View results: Password Complete the evaluation to get the password.

Scoring: 1-5.
1 = poor, 2 = room for improvement, 3 = adequate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent.

Name can we contact you if necessary?

Your main web-related role(s): (eg: web admin, design, web marketing, project manager, web programmer, jack-of-all-trades)

Overall score:
quick comment:

Venues:
Lectures quick comment:

Fair/Lunch quick comment:

What were the three aspects of the conference which you found most useful?
What were the three aspects of the conference which you found disappointing?

Talks:

Title overall value relevence

clarity and
 delivery

 level of detail
eGovernment missed this talk
UKOLN/Benchmarking missed this talk
Legal issues missed this talk
Next generation missed this talk
Accessibility missed this talk
XML missed this talk
Broadcasting & the web missed this talk
Publishing/social space missed this talk
Scoring: 1-5.
1 = poor, 2 = room for improvement, 3 = adequate, 4 = good, 5 = excellent.

What would you like discussed / presented at next year's conference?:

Any other comments:

The results of this evaluation will be anonymised before publication on this website. Thanks for your help!